BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 4 Develop a Research Plan
- High Quality FPX Sample Assessment
- Step-by-Step Guide to master FPX Assessment
- References (APA Format) for related Assessments
- Connect with Top professors for specific class
- Detailed (FAQs) related to Assessment.
- Express Delivery with in 24 hours.
Assessment Overview:
BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 4 is about making an exploration plan to find a result to the problem of retained surgical items (RSIs) in U.S. operating apartments. It includes defining the exploration problem, the purpose statement, the qualitative exploration question, the ways to collect data, and effects to suppose about when it comes to trustability and validity. The thing is to make cases safer by using strategies that are backed by substantiation and staff practices that work.
How to Pass BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 4 Develop a Research Plan
- Understand the Assignment – Focus on creating a research plan addressing the problem of retained surgical items (RSIs) in U.S. operating rooms.
- Define the Research Problem—Clearly explain the safety issue, its prevalence, and its impact on patients.
- Write a purpose statement—Describe what the study aims to achieve, e.g., reduce RSIs using safety protocols like “Five Ways to Safer Surgery.”
- Develop a Research Question – Use qualitative inquiry to explore factors contributing to RSIs and staff perspectives.
- Choose a Research Methodology—Select an appropriate qualitative approach, such as ethnography, for observing social and procedural dynamics.
- Select Data Collection Methods – Use observation to gather real-time data on practices, workflows, and interactions in surgical settings.
- Ensure Reliability – Show consistency in data collection methods and careful documentation to make findings trustworthy.
- Ensure Validity – Make sure measurements accurately reflect RSIs and related surgical practices.
- Draw Conclusions – Suggest evidence-based interventions, staff training, and safety protocol improvements.
- Cite Sources Properly—Use at least 3–5 scholarly references in APA 7th edition format to support your research plan.
Sample Assessment:
Developing a Research Plan
Throughout this paper, the focus is on expounding an exploration problem, purpose statement, and exploration question within the frame of an exploration plan. Also, a chosen data collection system is explained, followed by a disquisition of dimension trustability and validity, supported with applicable exemplifications.
Part 1: Problem Statement
Annually, between four and six thousand surgical procedures in the United States report cases of retained surgical outfits left unintentionally within patients’ bodies post-surgery, posing a significant patient safety concern (Fenner, 2019). These incidents, involving particulars similar to bloodsuckers, clips, needles, and caps, necessitate corrective conduct to alleviate implicit detriment to cases (Fencl, 2016). Mortal error emerges as a critical factor contributing to these circumstances (Birolini et al., 2016). Therefore, relating and addressing the underpinning causes is imperative to enhance patient safety in surgical settings.
Part 2: Purpose Statement
The exploration aims to dwindle the frequency of retained surgical particulars in U.S. operating apartments by enforcing the National Patient Safety Agency’s Five Ways to Safer Surgery program. This bid seeks to enhance surgical staff education and practices, eventually reducing the prevalence of similar safety crimes and perfecting patient care issues (Pyrek, 2017; Woodman, 2016). The purpose aligns with addressing the linked problem within operating apartments and proposes a methodical approach for its resolution (Woodman, 2016).
Part 3: Qualitative Research Question
The qualitative exploration question investigates the factors contributing to the adding rates of retained surgical crimes despite safety protocols. Through qualitative inquiry, this study aims to uncover underpinning issues and perspectives of surgical staff, easing the development of effective results (Choo et al., 2015). Exercising ethnographic exploration methodology offers a comprehensive understanding of the social dynamics and actions within operating apartments, abetting in relating strategies for enhancement (Chawla & Jones, 2017).
Part 4: Data Collection, Reliability, and Validity
Observation emerges as the preferred data collection system for this qualitative study, allowing experimenters to immerse themselves in the surgical terrain and prisoners’ nuanced relations and practices (Smit & Onwuegbuzie, 2018). By icing experimenters’ neutrality and scrupulous data recording, trustability and validity are upheld (Hasnida & Ghazali, 2016). Trustability assures harmonious findings across compliances, while validity ensures the accurate dimension of intended marvels (Hasnida & Ghazali, 2016).
Conclusion
In conclusion, addressing the issue of retained surgical particulars necessitates a multifaceted approach involving enhanced safety protocols, staff education, and effective communication. Through active exploration and perpetration of substantiation-grounded strategies, the goal of reducing similar incidents and perfecting patient safety can be achieved.
BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Develop a Research Plan
Dodgson, J. E. (2017). About exploration: Qualitative methodologies. Savant, 33(2), 355–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334417698693
Fencl, J. L. (2016). Guideline perpetration: prevention of retained surgical particulars. AORN Journal, 104(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2016.05.005
Fenner, K. (2019). The Joint Commission’s Hospital National Patient Safety pretensions for 2018. Compass Clinical Consulting. https://www.compassclinical.com/the-joint-commission-national-patient-safety-goals-for-2018/
Kim, F., da Silva, R., Gustafson, D., Nogueira, L., Harlin, T., & Paul, D. L. (2015). Current issues in patient safety in surgery. BMC, 9(26). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0067-4
Liber, M. (2018). Surgical bloodsuckers left outside the woman for six times. CNN Health. https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/21/health/surgical-sponges-left-inside-woman-study/index.html
BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Develop a Research Plan
Singh, S., & Estefan, A. (2018). opting for a predicated proposition approach for nursing exploration. Global Qualitative Nursing exploration, 5, 2333393618799571. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393618799571
Pyrek, K. (2017). Precluding retained surgical particulars is a platoon trouble. Infection control moment. https://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/patient-safety/preventing-retained-surgical-itemsteam-effort
Hasnida, N., & Ghazali, M. (2016). The trustability and validity of an instrument to estimate the academy-grounded assessment system. International Journal of Evaluation and Exploration in Education, 5(2), 148–157. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1108537.pdf
Woodman, N. (2016). World Health Organization surgical safety roster. WFSA. https://www.wfsahq.org/components/com_virtual_library/media/44cbdf2323955ae82f749dc47bee030e-325-WHO-Surgical-Safety-Checklist.pdf
References (APA 7 Format)
- Birolini, D. V., Rasslan, S., & Utiyama, E. M. (2016). Unintentionally retained foreign bodies after surgical procedures Analysis of 4547 cases. SciELO Analytics, 43(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912016001004
- Chawla, D., & Jones, R. M. (2017). Ethnography/ethnographic styles. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research styles, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0090
- Choo, E. K., Garro, A. C., Ranney, M. L., & Meisel, Z. F. (2015). Qualitative exploration in exigency care, part I: Research principles and common operations. Academic Emergency Medicine Journal, 22(9), 1096–1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12736
Rubric Breakdown
| Criteria | Basic (Low) | Proficient (Pass) | Distinguished (High) |
| Research Problem | Vague or unclear | Defines safety issue | Clearly explains prevalence, impact, and context of RSIs |
| Purpose Statement | Minimal explanation | States general aim | Clearly aligns purpose with problem and outcomes |
| Research Question | Weak or unclear | Simple question | Focused, qualitative question targeting staff behavior and RSIs |
| Methodology | Not specified | States qualitative approach | Justifies method and aligns with research objectives |
| Data Collection | Vague | Mentions method (e.g., observation) | Detailed plan for systematic observation and documentation |
| Reliability | Not addressed | Mentions consistency | Detailed plan ensuring trustworthiness across observations |
| Validity | Minimal | Mentions accuracy | Ensures measures directly capture RSIs and related practices |
| Conclusions & Recommendations | Weak | General suggestions | Specific, evidence-based interventions and staff training strategies |
| References & APA | Few or incorrect | Basic APA formatting | Proper APA 7th edition formatting with scholarly sources |
| Clarity & Organization | Disorganized | Some structure | Well-organized, clear, logical flow throughout the plan |
Step-by-Step Guide
- Define the Research Problem – Find out what the problem is with surgical particulars that are left before and after surgery and how it affects patient safety.
- Write a Purpose Statement Tell us what the study is trying to do, like putting safety rules in place (like “Five Ways to Safer Surgery”) to cut down on RSIs.
- produce a qualitative exploration question Concentrate on comprehending the contributing factors and staff issues concerning surgical crimes.
- Choose an exploration methodology—use qualitative styles like ethnography to look at how people act and interact in surgical settings.
- elect a Data Collection Method – Employ observation to document real-time practices, procedures, and social relations.
- Make sure your compliances are dependable by making sure they’re harmonious and unremarkable.
- Make sure the data is valid by checking that it directly shows the effects being studied (RSIs and surgical practices).
- Draw Conclusions Use what you learned to suggest changes to protocols, staff training, and interventions that will make cases safer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What’s the main thing about this exploration plan?
Lowering the number of retained surgical particulars (RSIs) in operating apartments by making safety rules and staff gestures more.
Q2: What does a purpose statement mean?
A clear explanation of what the study is trying to do and how it solves the exploration problem.
Q3: What’s the purpose of qualitative exploration?
To learn about the staff’s points of view, conduct, and the reasons behind RSIs.
Q4: What’s a stylish way to gather data?
An observation to see how effects are done and how people interact in the operating room in real time.
Q5: How do you ensure that trustability?
By constantly using observation styles and keeping track of data in a methodical way.
Integrity Note
Note: Only use this assessment example for learning and structure purpose. Do not submit as your own work.
We are an independent resource and are not affiliated with Capella University.