Literature Search
- High Quality FPX Sample Assessment
- Step-by-Step Guide to master FPX Assessment
- References (APA Format) for related Assessments
- Connect with Top professors for specific class
- Detailed (FAQs) related to Assessment.
- Express Delivery with in 24 hours.
Assessment Overview:
Literature Search The NURS-FPX 9902 Assessment 2 Literature Hunt is a rigorous, methodical exercise that establishes the substantiation-grounded foundation for your doctoral design. In this phase, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) scholars must move beyond casual searching to execute a high-position, reproducible strategy using scholarly databases.
The primary ideal is to identify a “transcendence of substantiation” that justifies your clinical intervention. However, a doctoral literature search is more than just a technical task; it is also an ethical responsibility. Applying ethical principles similar to veracity in reporting results and justice in opting for different sources is obligatory. This assessment requires you to validate your hunt process with enough detail that another experimenter could replicate your results, ensuring translucency and scholarly integrity. Also visit our NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 2
How to Pass Literature Search
To achieve a “distinguished” evaluation, your search must demonstrate thoroughness.
- Total comprehensiveness: Ensure that you did not simply select the first five results. Use multiple databases and document the total number of successes.
- Methodological translucency Your hunt log should be so detailed that your educator could enter your keywords into the same database and find the same papers.
- Critical Appraisal of Ethics Do not just list the papers; bandy about if they address ethical enterprises like data sequestration or health equity.
Sample Assessment:
NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 2: Literature Search
Introduction: The Ethics of Evidence Retrieval
A literature search is the “due diligence” phase of the DNP project. It is the ethical responsibility of the doctoral candidate to obtain the best possible evidence to support clinical change. By applying ethical principles—specifically beneficence (acting for the good of the patient) and veracity (truthfulness)—the nurse leader ensures that the proposed project is built on a foundation of proven safety and efficacy rather than professional conjecture (Doody & Noonan, 2016).
Search Strategy and Database Selection
For this project, the search focused on the impact of nursing informatics tools, such as Barcode Medication Administration (BCMA), on reducing errors. The following databases were utilized through the Capella Online Library:
- CINAHL Complete: Selected for its comprehensive indexing of nursing-specific literature.
- PubMed: Utilized for high-level clinical trials and systematic reviews.
- Cochrane Library: Searched for gold-standard meta-analyses.
Applying ethical principles to database selection means avoiding “predatory journals” that lack rigorous peer review, as citing unreliable data can erode professional trust and potentially harm patients (Oermann et al., 2020).
Keyword Development and Boolean Logic
The search strategy utilized Boolean operators (AND, OR) to narrow results.
- Search String: (Nursing Informatics OR BCMA) AND (Medication Safety OR Error Prevention) AND (Applying Ethical Principles).
The inclusion of ethical terms ensures that the retrieved literature addresses the moral implications of technology in care. For instance, applying ethical principles to informatics involves ensuring that automated tools respect patient autonomy and do not inadvertently create disparities in care (Asif & Khan, 2024).
Results and Preliminary Synthesis
The initial search yielded 452 records. After applying filters for “Peer-Reviewed” and “Publication Date: 2021-2026,” 85 articles remained. Following a title and abstract screening, 12 high-quality articles were selected for full-text review.
The synthesis of these articles reveals that while BCMA significantly reduces errors, system “workarounds” often challenge the ethical principle of fidelity. DNP leaders must address these ethical lapses during implementation to ensure that the technology serves its intended purpose of patient protection (Aloweni et al., 2022), which includes establishing clear guidelines and training to prevent the use of workarounds that compromise patient safety.
Conclusion: Ethical Integrity in Search Documentation
The completion of this literature search provides the evidentiary weight required to move forward with the doctoral project. By meticulously documenting the process and applying ethical principles to every stage—from keyword selection to source appraisal—the DNP candidate demonstrates the scholarly rigor and moral accountability required of an advanced practice nurse. Also visit our NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 1
References (APA 7 Format)
- Asif, K. B., & Khan, H. (2024). Role of nurse informaticists in the implementation of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) at resource-limited settings. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 40(9). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.9.9686
- Doody, O., & Noonan, M. (2016). Nursing research ethics, guidance, and application in practice. British Journal of Nursing, 25(14), 803–807. https://doi.org/10.12688/bjon.2016.25.14.803
- Goodfellow, L. T. (2023). An Overview of How to Search and Write a Medical Literature Review. Respiratory Care, 68(11), 1576–1584. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11198
- Oermann, M. H., Wrigley, J., Nicoll, L. H., Ledbetter, L. S., Carter-Templeton, H., & Edie, A. H. (2020). Integrity of Databases for Literature Searches in Nursing: Avoiding Predatory Journals. Advances in Nursing Science, 44(2), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1097/ans.0000000000000349
- Stillwell, S. B., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practice, Step by Step: Asking the Clinical Question: A Key Step in Evidence-Based Practice. American Journal of Nursing, 110(3), 58–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000368959.11129.79
Rubric Breakdown
| Criteria | Proficient | Distinguished |
| Search Strategy | Describes keywords and databases used. | Develops a masterful, highly reproducible search strategy using Boolean logic and MeSH terms. |
| Applying Ethical Principles | Identifies ethical considerations in source selection. | Critically synthesizes ethical frameworks to ensure the integrity, diversity, and reliability of the evidence. |
| Selection Criteria | Defines inclusion and exclusion criteria. | Provides a sophisticated rationale for criteria that align perfectly with the PICOT and ethical standards. |
| Documentation | Provides a basic list of search results. | Utilizes a PRISMA-style approach to document the entire retrieval and screening process with absolute transparency. |
Step-by-Step Guide
- Upgrade Your PICOT Question Your hunt begins with a clear Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outgrowth, and Timeframe (Stillwell et al., 2010).
- Select Scholarly Databases: Use at least 3 – 4 high-position databases similar to CINAHL, PubMed/MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library (Goodfellow, 2023).
- Identify Keywords and Snare Terms: Use Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) to ensure you’re landing all applicable language used in the literature.
- Apply Addition and Rejection Criteria Explicitly define the boundaries of your hunt, such as date ranges (generally the last five times), peer-reviewed status, and language.
- Document the hunt process: produce a hunt log or PRISMA inflow illustration to track the number of records linked, screened, and eventually included (Holly et al., 2023).
- Apply ethical considerations when implementing ethical principles; assess your sources for implicit bias and ensure your hunt includes diverse case populations to uphold the principle of justice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Can I use Google Scholar for this assessment?
A: While Google Scholar is useful for initial exploration, doctoral-level work requires the use of curated, peer-reviewed databases like CINAHL and PubMed to ensure you avoid predatory or non-scholarly sources (Oermann et al., 2020).
Q: What if I discover too many or too few articles?
A: If you discover too many, use “Limits” (e.g., specific age groups or settings). If you encounter too few, broaden your keywords or consult the “References” section of a relevant article for “ancestor searching.”
Q: Why does “Applying Ethical Principles” matter in a search?
A: Because as a researcher, you have an ethical duty to present a “fair” view of the evidence. Intentionally ignoring research that contradicts your project aim is an ethical violation of veracity.
Integrity Note
Note: Only use this assessment example for learning and structure purpose. Do not submit as your own work.
We are an independent resource and are not affiliated with Capella University.