NURS FPX 6025 Assessment 6 Practicum and MSN Reflection

Technology Needs Assessment

In the health care system, technology requires technology for technology related to intervals in the patient’s care and glaze in accordance with organizational pretension (Tumma et al., 2022). For Grace Hospital, this evaluation focuses on managing a new telestroke technology to improve stroke services. This article will detect the importance of evaluation of concepts related to clinical intervals and compliance with safety and insulation rules and address stakeholders.

Relevance and Importance of Needs Assessment

The direction for assessing a requirement is required for several reasons to administer telestroke at Grace Hospital. First, it ensures that the chosen technique is consistent with the pretension to complete the problems of the centurion patient, especially for cases of stroke that can withstand immediate and special care. A claim for claims is currently identifying specific intervals in stroke practice. This helps determine how the telestroke technique can bridge these intervals, can increase access to neurologists, and can potentially reduce mortality and disability (Stamina et al., 2021).

Assessment of needs will also help to ensure positive outcomes by presenting extensive analysis of living resources, workflows, and technical structure in the sanatorium. This perfect assessment allows for a targeted and effective performance strategy, reduces disruptions, and maximizes the efficiency of technology. Also, it will illuminate training conditions for staff, ensuring they are well-prepared to use the new system effectively, which is vital for patient safety and care quality (Babkair et al., 2023).

Failure to conduct a needs assessment could result in several negative consequences for Grace Hospital. Without this foundational step, there is a problem of concluding technology that doesn’t fit the sanatorium’s conditions or integrate well with existing systems, leading to wasted resources and implicit functional inefficiencies. Also, shy drugs could compromise patient care, pitfall compliance with safety and nonsupervisory morals, and ultimately damage the sanatorium’s character and financial stability (Bednar & Spiekermann, 2022). For Grace Hospital, the conditions assessment assumes that there are current gaps in stroke care that can be addressed by telehealth technology. It also assumes that the sanatorium’s structure and staff are suitable for conforming to and integrating new technological results effectively (Babkair et al., 2023).

Critical Issues in Nursing Care Addressed by TeleStroke Technology

The primary enterprises in nursing care at Grace Hospital that the new telestroke technology will address are prompt access to specialized stroke treatment and minimizing detainments in furnishing care. Rapid intervention is vital for stroke cases, and current limitations in on-point neurology moxie can lead to delayed opinion and treatment, negatively impacting patient issues. The telestroke technology will enable remote consultations with neurologists, easing hasty and more accurate assessments and interventions (Kandimalla et al., 2021).

The technology will support clinical decision-making by furnishing real-time access to expert opinions and validation-predicated practices, which can improve the overall quality of care. Leadership’s purchase decision will be strongly influenced by these issues, particularly the eventuality of enhancing patient issues through brisk opinion and treatment and the capability to aggregate data to cover trends, such as treatment response times and recovery rates. This data can further guide advancements in stroke care protocols and ensure compliance with best practice guidelines (Babkair et al., 2023).

While telestroke technology offers significant benefits, it’s essential to consider implicit challenges, such as ensuring reliable internet connectivity and educating enterprises about data security and case insulation. Also, some staff can be resistant to espousing telestroke technology, challenging comprehensive training and changing operation strategies to ensure successful performance and wide acceptance among healthcare providers (Guzik et al., 2021).

Safety Requirements and Regulatory Considerations

When implementing the Telestroke technology at Grace Hospital, many care conditions and non-initiatives should be answered. First, technology should cooperate with the rules of the Health Insurance Portability and the Liability Act (HIPAA) to ensure that the patient data is safely transmitted and stored and to ensure the patient’s secrecy and isolation (HHS.GOV, 2022). Second, technology should complete civil and state models for payment, which is the center of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as strategies for Telehealth services, including the criteria for materials and invoicing practices (CMS.GOV, 2023). Third, the technology should support meaningful use objects by perfecting care collaboration, enhancing patient engagement, and ensuring that clinical opinions are predicated on up-to-date and accurate information. Ensuring compliance with these conditions is critical for the telestroke’s effective integration into being care processes (Bashir, 2020).

To estimate whether the telestroke technology meets safety and nonsupervisory conditions at Grace Hospital, criteria should include verifying that the system adheres to HIPAA guidelines for data security and case insulation through regular checks and security assessments. Also, compliance with CMS telehealth content criteria can be assessed by reviewing billing practices and payment blessings. The technology’s donation to meaningful use objects can be estimated by tracking advancements in care collaboration and case engagement through performance criteria and patient feedback (CMS.gov, 2023; HHS.gov, 2022).

Confidentiality and Privacy Protections

For the telestroke technology at Grace Hospital, case confidentiality and insulation are consummate. The technology must incorporate robust data encryption features for both data at rest and in vehicles to cover Protected Health Information (PHI) from unauthorized access. Authentication and access panels should be applied to guarantee that only authorized workers can pierce patient data, and examination trails should be maintained to track access and variations to sensitive information (Demaerschalk et al., 2022).

In addition, the system will work with HIPAA rules, making PhIS safe handling mandatory and tolerating technology to influence the assessment of regular security issues to identify and address weaknesses. The underlying security risks include data violations from cyber attacks and shy encryption, leading to unauthorized access and user crime due to infelicitous handling of sensitive information. Addressing these risks includes strict security protocols, continuous monitoring, and staff training on Swish Practice to protect patient data (Demarschalk & Graham, 2024).

An important knowledge interval is present to understand the broader encryption styles, which are required for both the rest and in the vehicle, which is to complete the HIPAA morale for the Telestrobe technology (Demaking Director and Graham, 2024). There is also a need for clarity on specific authentication and access control mechanisms required to ensure that only the authorized user can punch holes in PHI to secure it. In addition, there is shy knowledge of specific cybersecurity risks for technology and Swish practice to reduce these risks effectively in protecting the patient’s data.

Impact of Stakeholders and End Users

The accession of telestroke technology at Grace Hospital will involve both internal and external stakeholders, each impacting the design’s success. As internal stakeholders, Crockers, babysitters, and IT employees will respond to how technology affects clinical workflow and technical integration. Doctors and Babelter must assess the effect of technology on patient care, while IT employees will ensure their technical feasibility and safety (Wong et al., 2023).

External stakeholders include issues, social and technology dealers. Cases and society will benefit from increased access to stroke experts, while traders will provide technology and support services. Stakeholders affect organizational changes through their support or resistance (Mayor et al., 2020). Doctors and baby monitors can interrupt changes in their routine, while the case and society may support advanced stroke (Bugot et al., 2020).

In order to maintain a vision for change, it is important to link stakeholders with regular updates, workouts, and views of technology. Taking up the resistance of the employees involves accepting companies, presenting extensive training, and pressing long-term benefits of patient care (Bugot et al., 2020). By effectively involving these stakeholders, Grace Hospital can ensure the successful accession and performance of telestroke technology (English et al., 2022).

It’s assumed that internal stakeholders, analogous to croakers and babysitters, will have enterprises about changes to their routines and workflows, which can be addressed through effective training and communication. It also assumes that cases and the community will support the technology due to its eventuality to improve access to specialized stroke care (Bagot et al., 2020).

Conclusion

A comprehensive technology needs assessment for new technology of telestroke at Grace Hospital reveals critical gaps in current stroke care that the new technology can address by furnishing timely access to specialized expertise. It highlights the significance of meeting safety, nonsupervisory, and insulation conditions and engaging stakeholders to ensure successful performance. By addressing these conditions, telestroke technology promises to improve patient issues and streamline stroke care processes.

NURS FPX 6025 Assessment 6 Practicum and MSN Reflection

Bednar, K., & Spiekermann, S. (2022). Eliciting values for technology design with moral philosophy: An empirical exploration of effects and shortcomings. Science, Technology & Human Values, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439221122595 

CMS.gov. (2023). Telehealth. Www.cms.gov. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/coverage/telehealth 

Demaerschalk, B. M., Aguilar, M. I., Ingall, T. J., Dodick, D. W., Vargas, B. B., Channer, D. D., Boyd, E. L., Kiernan, T. E. J., Fitz-Patrick, D. G., Collins, J. G., Hentz, J. G., Noble, B. N., Wu, Q., Brazdys, K., & Bobrow, B. J. (2022). Stroke telemedicine for Arizona rural residents: the legacy telestroke study. Telemedicine Reports, 3(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0002 

Demaerschalk, B. M., & Graham, G. D. (2024). Telemedicine in stroke systems of care. In Ischemic Stroke Therapeutics (pp. 437–444). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49963-0_32 

English, C., Ceravolo, M. G., Dorsch, S., Drummond, A., Gandhi, D. B., Halliday Green, J., Schelfaut, B., Verschure, P., Urimubenshi, G., & Savitz, S. (2022). Telehealth for rehabilitation and recovery after stroke: State of the evidence and future directions. International Journal of Stroke: Official Journal of the International Stroke Society, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930211062480 

Guzik, A. K., Martin-Schild, S., Tadi, P., Chapman, S. N., Al Kasab, S., Martini, S. R., Meyer, B. C., Demaerschalk, B. M., Wozniak, M. A., & Southerland, A. M. (2021). Telestroke across the continuum of care: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 30(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105802 

NURS FPX 6025 Assessment 6 Practicum and MSN Reflection

HHS.gov. (2022, June 21). HIPAA and Telehealth. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/telehealth/index.html 

Kandimalla, J., Vellipuram, A. R., Rodriguez, G., Maud, A., Cruz-Flores, S., & Khatri, R. (2021). Role of telemedicine in prehospital stroke care. Current Cardiology Reports, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01473-8 

Meyer, D., Rapp, K. S., Modir, R., Agrawal, K., Hailey, L., Mortin, M., Lane, R., Ranasinghe, T., Sorace, B., von Kleist, T. D., Perrinez, E., Nabulsi, M., & Hemmen, T. (2020). A stroke care model at an academic, comprehensive stroke center during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases: The Official Journal of the National Stroke Association, 29(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104927 

Tumma, A., Berzou, S., Jaques, K., Shah, D., Smith, A. C., & Thomas, E. E. (2022). Considerations for the implementation of a telestroke network: A systematic review. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106171 

Wong, C., Bayuo, J., Kam, F., Kwok, V. W.-Y., Wah, D., Yuen, B., Fong, C., Chan, S. T., & Chan, R. (2023). Sustaining telecare consultations in nurse-led clinics: Perceptions of stroke patients and advanced practice nurses: A qualitative study. Digital Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231176163