NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 2 Course Development and Influencing factors            

Course Development and Influencing Factors

Course development involves a comprehensive procedure inclined by internal and external factors, similar to organizational processes, stakeholder input, and nonsupervisory conditions (Mao et al., 2020). This paper focuses on the complications of designing a new course within a nursing class at Capella University (CU), focusing on the integration of informatics or telehealth. By checking the effect of colored factors on class design and uniting with internal and external stakeholders, we want to produce a strong course that meets the developed requirements for the nursing profession in the digital age.

Appropriate Course

A suitable course for the BSN class at CU could be “Health Informatics and Telehealth in Nursing.” This course would concentrate on integrating technology and data operation principles into nursing practice, emphasizing the use of informatics to enhance patient care delivery and communication in telehealth settings (Haupeltshofer et al., 2020). This course could be deposited in the later stages of the class, following foundational courses in nursing proposition, exploration, and clinical practice.

By this point, scholars would have acquired essential nursing knowledge and chops, making them more set to understand the role of informatics and telehealth in ultramodern healthcare delivery (Harris et al., 2021). Integrating this course at this stage would allow scholars to explore advanced motifs related to technology-enabled care delivery, preparing them to effectively work informatics tools and telehealth platforms in their nursing practice (Reid et al., 2022).

The Rationale for Adding this Particular Course

Adding a course on “Health Informatics and Telehealth in Nursing” to the BSN class at CU is essential for preparing unborn nurses to navigate the fleetly evolving geography of healthcare technology. With the added integration of informatics and telehealth in nursing practice, graduates need to be fortified with the mindfulness and capacities to influence these tools efficiently. A study by Forman et al. (2020) found that incorporating informatics education into nursing programs is pivotal for promoting the relinquishment of technology in healthcare delivery. Likewise, exploration by Butzner and Cuffee (2021) highlights the significance of telehealth in perfecting patient access to care, especially in underserved communities.

By adding this course, CU can ensure that its graduates are complete in using informatics to manage patient data, make informed clinical opinions, and communicate effectively in telehealth settings. This aligns with the recommendation of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) that nursing programs integrate informatics capabilities into their classes (AACN, 2019). Also, the addition of telehealth education reflects the growing demand for nurses who can give virtual care and acclimatize to technological advancements in healthcare delivery (Barbosa et al., 2021).

Topical Outline of the Course

The proposed course, “Health Informatics and Telehealth in Nursing,” would cover a range of motifs essential for preparing nursing scholars to use technology in healthcare delivery effectively. The course figure would include modules on foundational generalities of health informatics, Electronic Health Records (EHR), telehealth technologies, legal and ethical considerations in telehealth, and the addition of informatics into care practice (Barbosa et al., 2021). Also, it would explore motifs similar to data operation and security, substantiation—grounded practice in informatics—and patient education through telehealth platforms (Forman et al., 2020). The figure is given in excursus 1.

The integration of this course into the BSN class at CU aligns with courses similar to Nursing Exploration and Substantiation—Grounded Practice, where learners learn to analytically assess exploration literature, including studies related to health informatics and telehealth. Also, the course complements courses like Health Assessment and Promotion, as nurses increasingly use telehealth platforms for conducting assessments and promoting healthy actions. This interconnectedness ensures that scholars receive a comprehensive education that prepares them for the demands of ultramodern nursing practice (Reid et al., 2022).

Collaboration with Faculty Members

When considering the addition of a new course focusing on informatics or telehealth within the BSN class at CU, faculty members would unite with colorful stakeholders to ensure its successful integration. Originally, they would engage with academic associates within the nursing department, drawing on their moxie in nursing education, class design, and pedagogy. Through cooperative meetings and brainstorming sessions, these faculty members can contribute ideas, give feedback, and ensure alignment with the program’s pretensions and learning issues specific to informatics and telehealth (Gartz & O’Rourke, 2020). Also, collaboration with rehearsing nurses and healthcare directors would be essential to gather perceptivity into current trends, arising issues, and the practical use of informatics and telehealth in real-world healthcare settings.

Their input would help ensure that the course stays applicable, foremost, and reflective of the developing conditions of the nursing profession in the environment of technological advancements (Poitras et al., 2023). In developing a new informatics or telehealth course for CU’s BSN class, faculty would unite with nursing department associates and healthcare professionals. This collaboration ensures alignment with program pretensions and applicability to evolving industry requirements. Also, engagement with delegation bodies like the Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN) ensures adherence to quality norms and reflects current nursing practice trends (ACEN, 2024).

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 2 Course Development and Influencing Factors

Also, involving technology experts or educational contrivers would be pivotal, especially for courses involving informatics or telehealth. They can guide to effectively include technology in professional classes, design with interactive reading skills, and customize the online literacy experience for scholars who follow the BSN program in CU (Jonasadotir et al., 2022). Faculty members can develop a new course for BSN learning by practicing professionals and technology experts by consulting academic colleagues and practicing technology experts. This cooperative trouble ensures that the course meets the specific requirements and prospects of scholars while aligning with assiduity norms and arising trends. This cooperative approach ensures that the course is well-designed, applicable, and effective in preparing scholars for the demands of ultramodern nursing practice enhanced by technology (Kulju & Mikkonen, 2024).

The explanation for the collaborations lies in employing different moxie to ensure the new course on informatics or telehealth suits the assiduity criteria and meets the evolving conditions of nursing practice (Jonasdottir et al., 2022). Faculty members unite with academic associates for pedagogical perceptivity, rehearsing nurses for real-world applicability, and technology experts for effective integration of digital tools. This multidisciplinary approach ensures the course is robust and applicable and prepares scholars for the realities of ultramodern healthcare (Poitras et al., 2023).

Internal Factors

Internal factors similar to organizational processes significantly impact the design of a class within academic institutions, particularly in nursing education. Class panels, for illustration, are vital in reviewing and approving proposed changes or additions to the class. These panels convene regularly to assess the effectiveness of courses, identify areas for enhancement, and suggest variations to enhance pupil learning issues (Gouëdard et al., 2020). For example, if a nursing program wishes to introduce a new course on telehealth, the class commission would estimate how this addition aligns with the program’s pretensions and delegation norms (Hui et al., 2021).

Likewise, internal review bodies, similar to academic boards or faculty statehouses, oversee the overall class development process. They ensure adherence to established protocols and quality norms (McCauley & Swartz, 2020). For illustration, if the nursing faculty proposes a significant modification to the clinical internship structure, the academic board would review the offer to ensure it meets nonsupervisory conditions and maintains the program’s integrity (McCauley & Swartz, 2020).

Organizational processes like budget allocation and resource operation also impact class design. Further fiscal coffers may be demanded to ensure the development of new courses and the integration of advanced technologies into the class. For example, if a nursing program wants to incorporate simulation labs for telehealth training, it needs to allocate finances for copping equipment and training faculty (Hui et al., 2021). Also, faculty workload considerations, staff vacuity, and executive programs impact the perpetration of class changes. These internal factors bear careful planning, collaboration, and prioritization to effectively navigate organizational constraints while seeking for excellence in nursing education (McCauley & Swartz, 2020).

External Factors

External factors, including backing considerations, play a significant influence on class design in nursing education. For example, limited backing from state or civil sources may circumscribe nursing programs’ capability to develop new courses or integrate innovative tutoring styles. For illustration, suppose a nursing program seeks to apply a simulation lab for telehealth training. In that case, further backing may help acquire necessary outfits and coffers, impacting the quality of education handed out (Nethers & Milstead, 2022).

Stakeholders, including healthcare associations, professional associations, and community groups, also play a pivotal part in shaping nursing classes. For example, input from healthcare employers regarding the chops and capabilities demanded in the pool informs class development (National Academy of Medicine, 2021). Also, collaboration with professional nursing associations ensures alignment with assiduity norms and stylish practices. For illustration, suppose an original sanitarium expresses a need for nurses competent in telehealth technologies. In that case, the nursing program may incorporate telehealth training into its class to meet this demand (National Academy of Medicine, 2021).

Regulatory and accrediting associations like the ACEN and state nursing boards produce marks and guidelines that nursing programs must cleave to (ACEN, 2024). For illustration, if ACEN introduces new delegation criteria related to telehealth education, nursing programs must modify their classes to ensure compliance. Failure to meet nonsupervisory conditions can imperil program delegation and pupil eligibility for licensure, emphasizing the significance of alignment with external norms (ACEN, 2024). Also, the Health Insurance Portability and Responsibility Act (HIPAA) regulations will impact the integration of telehealth and informatics into the BSN class by emphasizing the significance of securing patient sequestration in digital healthcare settings (HHS, 2022).

Impact of Parent Institution on Curriculum Design

The charge, station, and figure of CU and its BSN program profoundly impact class design. For example, the program’s gospel emphasizes invention and rigidity in nursing education, which leads to the integration of arising healthcare technologies like telehealth into the class. Also, suppose CU’s charge prioritizes availability and inclusivity in education. In that case, the BSN program incorporates flexible online literacy modalities to accommodate different pupil populations, including working professionals seeking to advance their nursing careers (Kulju & Mikkonen, 2024).

Also, the overarching frame of the BSN program, similar to the alignment with the AACN rudiments of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice, attends to syllabus development. For illustration, suppose one of the AACN rudiments emphasizes informatics and healthcare technology. In that case, the BSN program offers courses specifically concentrated on informatics and telehealth to ensure graduates retain the necessary capabilities for ultramodern nursing practice (AACN, 2019).

Type of Collaboration

In the process of class development for the BSN program at CU, collaboration between external and internal stakeholders is vital. Internally, faculty members, academic counsels, and class inventors must work nearly to align the class with the program’s charge, gospel, and delegation norms. External parties like healthcare interpreters, assiduity specialists, and former scholars offer inestimable perspectives on contemporary trends, evolving methodologies, and employment essentials. Their input ensures class responsiveness and applicability to the dynamic healthcare sector geography (Nethers & Milstead, 2022).

Likewise, collaboration with nonsupervisory bodies and accrediting agencies, similar to the AACN, is essential to ensure compliance with delegation norms and nonsupervisory conditions. This collaboration may involve seeking feedback on proposed class changes, witnessing program evaluations, and sharing in delegation point visits (Porter Lipscomb & Zupec, 2020). Also, hookups with healthcare institutions and clinical agencies grease clinical placements, existential literacy openings, and input on clinical practice prospects, enhancing the practical applicability and effectiveness of the class (Quqandi et al., 2022).

Failure to cooperate effectively with interior and external stakeholders in the course enhancement process can lead to several consequences. Internally, lack of collaboration may affect a class that doesn’t align with the program’s charge and objectives, leading to advancement among faculty and scholars. Externally, failure to involve assiduity experts and nonsupervisory agencies may result in a course that doesn’t match current practice ideals or delegation wants, risking the program’s character and graduates’ capability to meet licensure or instrument criteria (Porter Lipscomb & Zupec, 2020). Also, without input from healthcare institutions, the class may lack practical applicability and fail to adequately prepare scholars for the realities of clinical practice (Quqandi et al., 2022).

Conclusion

Class development in nursing education involves considering internal and external factors like organizational processes, stakeholder input, and nonsupervisory conditions. Collaboration among faculty, directors, accrediting agencies, and assiduity stakeholders ensures alignment with professional norms and healthcare trends. Shy cooperation may lead to class scarcities and a mismatch with nursing profession needs. Effective collaboration is essential for creating applicable, substantiation-grounded nursing education programs.Discover key insights and a polished structure in our NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 2 Course Development and Influencing Factors sample paper.

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 2 Course Development and Influencing Factors

Forman, T. M., Armor, D. A., & Miller, A. S. (2020). A review of clinical informatics competencies in nursing to inform best practices in education and nurse faculty development. Nursing Education Perspectives, 41(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nep.0000000000000588 

Gartz, J., & O’Rourke, J. (2020). Telehealth educational interventions in nurse practitioner education. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 33(11), 872–878. https://doi.org/10.1097/jxx.0000000000000488 

Gouëdard, P., Pont, B., Hyttinen, S., & Huang, P. (2020). Curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation. www.oecd-ilibrary.org. https://doi.org/10.1787/efe8a48c-en 

Harris, K. E., Durham, C., Logan, A., Smith, G., & Morris, R. (2021). Integration of telehealth education into the health care provider curriculum: A review. Telemedicine and E-Health, 27(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0261 

Haupeltshofer, A., Egerer, V., & Seeling, S. (2020). Promoting health literacy: What potential does nursing informatics offer to support older adults in the use of technology? A scoping review. Health Informatics Journal, 26(4), 2707–2721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458220933417 

HHS. (2022, June 21). HIPAA and Telehealth. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/telehealth/index.html 

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 2 Course Development and Influencing Factors

Hui, K. Y., Haines, C., Bammann, S., Hallandal, M., Langone, N., Williams, C., & McEvoy, M. (2021). To what extent is telehealth reported to be incorporated into undergraduate and postgraduate allied health curricula: A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256425 

Jonasdottir, S. K., Thordardottir, I., & Jonsdottir, T. (2022). Health professionals’ perspective towards challenges and opportunities of telehealth service provision: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104862 

Kulju, E., & Mikkonen, K. (2024). Educational interventions and their effects on healthcare professionals’ digital competence development: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105396 

Mao, A., Lu, S., Lin, Y., & He, M. (2020). A scoping review on the influencing factors and development process of professional identity among nursing students and nurses. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(2), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.04.018 

McCauley, J. L., & Swartz, A. E. (2020). Reframing telehealth. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 47(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2020.02.001 

National Academy of Medicine. (2021). The future of nursing 2020-2030: Charting a path to achieve health equity. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25982 

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 2 Course Development and Influencing Factors

Nethers, S. B., & Milstead, J. A. (2022). Future perspectives on nursing policy, technology, education, and practice. Nursing Clinics of North America, 57(4), 627–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2022.06.010 

Poitras, M.-E., Couturier, Y., Beaupré, P., Girard, A., Aubry, F., Vaillancourt, V. T., Carrier, J.-D., Fortin, L., Racine, J., Morneau, J., Boudreault, A., Cormier, C., Morin, A., & McGraw, M. (2023). Collaborative practice competencies needed for telehealth delivery by health and social care professionals: A scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 38(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2023.2213712 

Porter Lipscomb, C., & Zupec, J. (2020). Use of telehealth experiences to facilitate interprofessional education. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 77(10), 734–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaa033 

Quqandi, E., Joy, M., Drumm, I., & Rushton, M. (2022). Augmented reality in supporting healthcare and nursing independent learning. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 41(5), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000000910 

Reid, L., Button, D., Breaden, K., & Brommeyer, M. (2022). Nursing Informatics and undergraduate nursing curricula: A scoping review protocol. Nurse Education in Practice, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103476