event
NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3

NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission

Assessment Overview:

NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3: This evaluation emphasizes enhancing interprofessional collaboration for the management of congestive heart failure (CHF). Collaboration among health professionals, such as cardiologists, nurses, nutritionists, and pharmacists, leads to patient-centered care. Structured care materials, electronic health records (EHR), patient training, digital health equipment, telecommunications, and support programs are all important strategies. Ethical theory partners indifferent distribution of care. Delays in sanatorium care, better drug farming, better tonsil surgery, and happier patients all help to reduce serious problems.

How to Pass NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission

  1. Explain the evidence-based intervention and why it is important.
  2. Include a well-defined PICOT question and link it to your intervention.
  3. Highlight collaboration among a multidisciplinary healthcare team.
  4. Explain care coordination efforts and how patients are engaged in their care.
  5. Incorporate technology such as telehealth, which allows remote consultations with healthcare providers, digital health tools that help track health metrics, and EHRs (electronic health records) that store patient information digitally.
  6. Provide patient education strategies and resources to support behavior change.
  7. Address ethical principles like beneficence, autonomy, justice, and non-maleficence.
  8. Use stakeholder engagement strategies and describe change leadership (e.g., Lewin’s model).
  9. Identify measurable outcomes like improved blood pressure, adherence, and patient satisfaction.
  10. Make the video professional, organized, clear, and engaging with visuals to support your points.

Sample Assessment:

Disseminating Evidence: Scholarly Video Media Submission 

Abstract This donation focuses on propagating substantiation in nursing, emphasizing the significance of participating knowledge and exploration within the healthcare community. The study explores the effectiveness of life variations versus antihypertensive specifics in fat grown-ups with hypertension. Through a comprehensive analysis, it’s argued that life changes are more favorable in achieving better health issues in this population.

Introduction 

Dispersion of substantiation is a critical aspect of nursing, involving the sharing of exploration and information with fellow healthcare professionals (Chambers, 2018).

It encompasses the communication of information and coffers related to substantiation-grounded interventions (Chambers, 2018). In healthcare, introducing new ways to a target followership hinges on propagating substantiation-grounded practices (Purtle et al., 2020). To bridge gaps in substantiation-grounded interventions and address perpetration challenges effectively, it’s imperative to use strategies that grease the acceptance and integration of substantiation-grounded conditioning (Purtle et al., 2020). This videotape donation aims to circulate substantiation-grounded approaches related to my intervention and sustain positive issues.

Care Coordination Efforts 

The PICOT Question 

In fat grown-ups with hypertension, do life variations compared to antihypertensive specifics affect low blood pressure within 6 months?

  • Population of fat grown-ups
  • Intervention life variations
  • Comparison of life variations versus specifics
  • outgrowth Low blood pressure
  • Time: Six months

Brief Introduction to the Issues 

Rotundity is explosively associated with hypertensive symptoms, aggravating the condition in affected individualities. Studies indicate that rotundity is responsible for a significant proportion of primary hypertension cases (Ahmadi et al., 2019). Life variations, similar to salutary changes and increased physical exertion, have been proposed as effective interventions for hypertensive individualities (Ahmadi et al., 2019). Again, antihypertensive specifics have demonstrated adverse effects within six months of use (Olowofela & Isah, 2018). Thus, life changes are recommended over drugs (Olowofela & Isah, 2018). Healthcare interpreters play a pivotal part in impacting patient gestures by educating them about the benefits of life changes (Shayesteh et al., 2018).

Educational enterprises are essential in raising complaint mindfulness and promoting gesture revision among hypertension cases (Shayesteh et al., 2018).

Care Coordination Efforts 

Care collaboration aims to enhance the delivery of healthcare services within and across systems (Kruk et al., 2018). A multidisciplinary healthcare platoon, consisting of dietitians, nurses, cardiologists, information technologists, and physiotherapists, collaborates in the treatment of hypertensive cases. Team-grounded care involves cases in their own healthcare opinions, with regular platoon meetings concentrated on setting objects and creating patient-centered pretensions (Will et al., 2019).

NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission 

The healthcare platoon employs a holistic approach, with nutritionists furnishing substantiation-grounded diet plans, physiotherapists offering acclimatized exercise rules, cardiologists covering cases’ symptoms, and information technologists easing telehealth results (Nicolai et al., 2018).

Implications 

The relinquishment of care collaboration supports the achievement of the triadic end of health reform, perfecting patient quality and satisfaction (Kohl et al., 2018). By coordinating patient care and engaging fat hypertensive cases in their treatment, healthcare professionals can foster better health outcomes (Kohl et al., 2018).

Change in Practice Related to Services and Resources 

Resources 

Healthcare professionals should give cases with information about the benefits of life changes through fact sheets, guidelines, social media dispatches, and handouts (CDC, 2020).

Services 

Care fellows, including nurses and other medical professionals, should offer support and stimulants to fat hypertensive cases, easing their active participation in managing their condition (Hansen et al., 2021). Also, healthcare providers can produce customized care plans and use telehealth for patient education (Hansen et al., 2021).

NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission 

Key Care Coordination Efforts 

Platoon-grounded care is essential for achieving value-grounded care pretensions and enhancing the patient experience (Rollet et al., 2021). Multidisciplinary platoon meetings are necessary in agitating patient conditions, judgments, and treatment plans, increasing adherence to substantiation-grounded guidelines (Rollet et al., 2021).

Efforts to Build Stakeholder Engagement 

Stakeholder engagement involves relating, assessing, organizing, and enforcing conduct to impact stakeholders (Sperry & Jetter, 2019). A stakeholder engagement plan should consider each stakeholder’s requirements and demands (Sperry & Jetter, 2019).

Leading the Change in Practice 

Nurses can apply Kurt Lewin’s change proposition to initiate practice changes and engage stakeholders in intervention strategies for fat hypertensive cases (McFarlan et al., 2019). This process involves unfreezing, changing, and refreezing stages to gain stakeholder support, apply changes, and cover compliance (McFarlan et al., 2019).

Encouraging and Building Stakeholder Engagement 

Organizations should establish a robust stakeholder engagement strategy, beginning with a stakeholder engagement plan that outlines stakeholders’ involvement, approach, and objects (Boaz et al., 2018). Stakeholders’ needs, interests, and perspectives should be admired throughout the process (Boaz et al., 2018).

Future Recommendations 

Sustaining the Current Outcomes 

To maintain patient issues, stakeholders should engage in regular interprofessional collaboration through daily platoon meetings, easing effective communication with cases (Kruk et al., 2018). Enhanced communication fosters trust and fellowship, leading to better health issues (Kruk et al., 2018). Healthcare professionals should prioritize patient information confidentiality and approach case questions with a problem-solving mindset (McFarlan et al., 2019).

Recommendations on Moving Forward 

To enhance care collaboration for the unborn patient care enterprise, healthcare providers should consider the ensuing recommendations.

  • Develop a stakeholder engagement plan.
  • Address stakeholders’ needs.
  • Use SMART pretensions for setting attainable case objects.
  • Apply the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle to assess changes.
  • influence technology for interprofessional collaboration.

Conclusion 

In conclusion, propagating substantiation in nursing involves participating knowledge, perceptivity, and exploration with healthcare professionals. Effective substantiation dispersion is pivotal for introducing new approaches to specific cults. This videotape donation aims to impart knowledge and ideas related to my intervention plan for fat hypertensive individuals.Get inspired by our high-scoring NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 Disseminating The Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submissionexample to strengthen your own assignment.

NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission 

McFarlan, S., O’Brien, D., & Simmons, E. (2019). Nurse-leader collaborative improvement project: Improving patient experience in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2018.11.007 

Nicolai, J., Müller, N., Noest, S., Wilke, S., Schultz, J.-H., Gleißner, C. A., Eich, W., & Bieber, C. (2018). To change or not to change—that is the question.A qualitative study of lifestyle changes following acute myocardial infarction. Chronic Illness, 14(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395317694700 

Olowofela, A. O., & Isah, A. O. (2018). A profile of adverse effects of antihypertensive medicines in a tertiary care clinic in Nigeria. Annals of African Medicine, 16(3), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_6_17 

Purtle, J., Marzalik, J. S., Halfond, R. W., Bufka, L. F., Teachman, B. A., & Aarons, G. A. (2020). Toward the data-driven dissemination of findings from psychological science. American Psychologist, 75(8), 1052–1066. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000721 

Rollet, Q., Bouvier, V., Moutel, G., Launay, L., Bignon, A.-L., Bouhier-Leporrier, K., Launoy, G., & Lièvre, A. (2021). Multidisciplinary team meetings:Are all patients presented, and does it impact the quality of care and survival? A registry-based study. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07022-x 

Shayesteh, H., Mirzaei, A., Sayehmiri, K., Qorbani, M., & Mansourian, M. (2018). Effect of an education intervention on the lifestyle of patients with hypertension among the rural population of Lorestan province. Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 6(2), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.15280/jlm.2016.6.2.58 

Sperry, R. C., & Jetter, A. J. (2019). A systems approach to project stakeholder management: Fuzzy cognitive map modeling. Project Management Journal, 50(6), 875697281984787. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819847870 

Will, K. K., Johnson, M. L., & Lamb, G. (2019). Team-Based Care and Patient Satisfaction in the Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review. Advocate Aurora Health Institutional Repository. https://doi.org/10.17294%2F2330-0698.1695

References (APA 7 Format)

  • Ahmadi, S., Sajjadi, H., Nosrati Nejad, F., Ahmadi, N., Karimi, S. E., Yoosefi, M., & Rafiey, H. (2019). What do doctors in Iran say about lifestyle changes that can help control high blood pressure? Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 33, 43. 
  • Boaz, A., Hanney, S., Borst, R., O’Shea, A., & Kok, M. (2018). How to get stakeholders involved in research: design principles to help make things better. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1). 
  • https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0337-6  
  • Control and Prevention (CDC) has a page on their website that has information about high blood pressure for health professionals._materials.htm Chambers, C. T. (2018). From evidence to influence. PAIN, 159, S56–S64. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001327 
  • Hansen, A. R., McLendon, S. F., & Rochani, H. (2021). Care coordination for rural residents with chronic disease: Factors influencing enhanced outcomes. Nursing for Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13038 
  • Kohl, S., Schoenfelder, J., Fügener, A., & Brunner, J. O. (2018). The application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in the healthcare sector, particularly in hospitals. Health Care Management Science, 22(2), 245–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-018-9436-8 
  • Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Arsenault, C., Jordan, K., Leslie, H. H., Roder-DeWan, S., Adeyi, O., Barker, P., Daelmans, B., Doubova, S. V., English, M., Elorrio, E. G., Guanais, F., Gureje, O., Hirschhorn, L. R., Jiang, L., Kelley, E., Lemango, E. T., Liljestrand, J., & Malata, A. (2018). High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. The Lancet Global Health, 6(11), e1196–e1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30386-3 

Rubric Breakdown

Criteria Excellent (A) Satisfactory (B-C) Needs Improvement (D-F)
Clarity of Evidence Dissemination Clearly presents evidence-based intervention and rationale in a scholarly, understandable way. Presents intervention but lacks clarity or full explanation. Evidence and intervention unclear or poorly explained.
Use of PICOT Framework Clearly identifies PICOT elements and links them to the intervention. PICOT mentioned but partially linked to intervention. PICOT missing or unclear.
Interprofessional Collaboration Demonstrates collaboration among multidisciplinary team with defined roles. Collaboration mentioned but incomplete or vague. Collaboration unclear or absent.
Care Coordination & Patient Engagement Effectively describes coordination, stakeholder involvement, and patient-centered approaches. Some aspects of coordination described but incomplete. Coordination or patient engagement unclear or missing.
Use of Technology Integrates digital health tools, telehealth, and EHRs to support intervention and patient monitoring. Technology mentioned but not fully applied. Technology use unclear or absent.
Educational Strategies Provides clear patient education strategies and resources for behavior change. Education strategies mentioned but lacking detail. Patient education unclear or absent.
Ethical Considerations Includes ethical principles such as beneficence, autonomy, justice, non-maleficence in intervention. Ethics mentioned but not fully applied. Ethics missing or unclear.
Stakeholder Engagement & Change Leadership Demonstrates use of stakeholder engagement plans and change models (e.g., Lewin) effectively. Engagement or change process mentioned but incomplete. Engagement/change process unclear or absent.
Expected Outcomes Clearly identifies measurable outcomes: improved health, patient adherence, satisfaction, reduced complications. Outcomes mentioned but vague or unmeasurable. Outcomes unclear or missing.
Presentation & Professionalism Video is organized, concise, professional, and scholarly; visuals enhance understanding. Video somewhat organized; minor issues with clarity or professionalism. Video disorganized, unclear, or unprofessional.

Step-by-Step Guide

  1. Assess Current Practices
    • Find times when communication, collaboration, and sharing of patient care happen.
  2. Implement Structured Care Frameworks
    • Make sure that all Plato members know where they are supposed to be and what they are supposed to do.
  3. Enhance Interprofessional Collaboration
    • Encourage cardiologists, nurses, dietitians, and drug experts to work together.
  4. Leverage Technology
    • Use EHRs to share data in real time.
    • Combine digital health tools like MyHeartCounts and MyChart.
    • For remote care, use telehealth platforms like Amwell and Teladoc.
  5. Provide Patient Education
    • Use the AHA Heart Failure companion and the HFSA shops to check the tone.
  6. Support Programs
    • Provide community coffers and peer support through groups like Heart Failure Support Group and Better Choices, Better Health.
  7. Training for Providers
    • Programs like the Heart Failure Symposium that teach all the time help people work together.
  8. Monitor and Evaluate Outcomes
    • Keep track of drug adherence, tone operation, patient satisfaction, and readmissions to the sanitarium.
    • Take on problems like getting providers to use EHRs and getting them to work together.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Why is it important for different professionals to work together in CHF care?

AIt makes communication and teamwork better, helps with patient problems, and cuts down on readmissions to the sanitarium.

Q2: How do telehealth and digital tools make CHF operations better?

  1. They make it possible to do symptom shadowing, drug monitoring, patient engagement, and remote consultations.

Q3: What role do case education programs play?

Educated cases better manage symptoms, stick to the details, and take care of their tone.

Q4: What moral rules go along with CHF cooperative care?

Beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and autonomy.

Q5: What problems are expected to come up from better teamwork?

Fewer readmissions, better adherence, better tone operation, and higher patient satisfaction.

Integrity Note

Note: Only use this assessment example for learning and structure purpose. Do not submit as your own work.
We are an independent resource and are not affiliated with Capella University.

You cannot copy content of this page

Scroll to Top

Get your FPX Assessments in just 24 hours!

Verification required to avoid bots.