Assessment 3: Intervention Plan Design
Maebel Grace
Capella University
Instructor’s Name
April 2024
Intervention Plan Design
In this assessment, I will focus on the development of a comprehensive intervention plan aimed at addressing the intricate challenge of managing chronic pain in cancer patients within oncology care settings. Building upon the problem statement and literature review previously established, this intervention plan seeks to delineate specific components and strategies to enhance pain management practices. By integrating theoretical foundations, this intervention plan endeavors to offer a holistic approach to pain management.
Part 1-Intervention Plan Components
The intervention plan designed to address the management of chronic pain in cancer patients within oncology care settings encompasses several key components. Firstly, systematic pain assessment forms a foundational element, involving the routine evaluation of pain intensity, location, quality, and associated symptoms using validated tools such as the Numerical Rating Scale or the Brief Pain Inventory (Kim & Jung, 2020).
Secondly, multidisciplinary collaboration is essential for comprehensive pain management. This component involves the involvement of a diverse team of healthcare professionals, including oncologists, nurses, pain specialists, pharmacists, physical therapists, and psychologists. Collaborative decision-making ensures holistic care delivery, with input from various specialties to address the multifaceted aspects of cancer-related pain effectively (Çağlayan et al., 2023).
Thirdly, in order to enable patients to participate in their pain management, patient education is essential. Patient education fosters informed decision-making and promotes self-efficacy in managing pain, ultimately contributing to improved treatment outcomes (Coronado et al., 2020).
This intervention plan will be evaluated based on a number of criteria. Firstly, changes in pain intensity and severity, functional status, and quality of life among cancer patients will serve as objective measures of intervention effectiveness. Reductions in pain scores and improvements in physical functioning and emotional well-being indicate positive outcomes. Additionally, patient satisfaction surveys and feedback mechanisms will capture subjective experiences and perceptions of pain management interventions, providing valuable insights into the acceptability and effectiveness of the intervention.
Impact of Cultural Needs and Characteristics of a Target Population
Cultural beliefs and practices surrounding pain perception, expression, and management vary widely among different cultural groups. Assumptions underlying this impact include the recognition that cultural factors such as stoicism, fear of addiction, and reliance on traditional healing practices influence patients’ willingness to report pain, adhere to treatment recommendations, and engage with pain management interventions (Filipponi et al., 2022). To guarantee their efficacy and acceptance, therapies must be culturally aware and customized to meet the particular requirements and preferences of varied patient populations
Secondly, language barriers and communication styles present challenges in delivering effective pain management interventions. Assumptions here include acknowledging that patients from diverse cultural backgrounds have limited proficiency in the dominant language spoken in healthcare settings, hindering their ability to accurately convey pain symptoms and treatment preferences. Moreover, cultural norms regarding communication, such as deference to authority figures or discomfort discussing sensitive topics, impede open dialogue between patients and healthcare providers (Almasri & McDonald, 2023). Therefore, interventions should incorporate language-concordant communication strategies, interpreter services, and culturally appropriate communication techniques to facilitate effective patient-provider interactions and optimize treatment outcomes.
Thirdly, cultural values, traditions, and social support networks influence patients’ coping mechanisms and treatment preferences. Assumptions underpinning this impact include recognizing that family dynamics, community norms, and religious beliefs play pivotal roles in shaping individuals’ perceptions of pain and illness. Therefore, interventions should involve family members and caregivers in the pain management process, providing education and support to enhance their understanding of pain management strategies and their role in supporting patients’ well-being. Additionally, interventions should respect patients’ cultural preferences regarding treatment modalities, incorporating complementary and alternative therapies where appropriate and feasible to address pain and promote holistic healing.
Part 2-Theoretical Nursing Models, Strategies from Other Disciplines, and Healthcare Technologies
One prominent nursing model is the Biopsychosocial Model in understanding and managing pain. Strengths of this model include its holistic approach, which acknowledges the multifaceted nature of pain experiences and guides the development of comprehensive pain management interventions tailored to the individual needs of cancer patients (Hassankhani et al., 2023). However, a potential weakness of this model lies in its complexity, which may pose challenges in operationalizing and implementing interventions effectively within busy clinical settings. Additionally, the Biopsychosocial Model require interdisciplinary collaboration to address all dimensions of pain adequately, necessitating clear communication and coordination among healthcare team members (Hassankhani et al., 2023).
Drawing from strategies in psychology and behavioral science, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) offers strengths and weaknesses in the context of pain management interventions. CBT emphasizes the role of cognitive processes, emotions, and behaviors in influencing pain perception and coping strategies (Hamedi et al., 2020). Strengths of CBT include its evidence-based efficacy in reducing pain intensity and improving coping skills. Incorporating CBT techniques such as cognitive restructuring, relaxation training, and activity pacing into pain management interventions for cancer patients can empower individuals to develop adaptive pain management strategies and regain a sense of control over their pain experiences (Hamedi et al., 2020). However, a potential weakness of CBT lies in its resource-intensive nature, requiring specialized training for healthcare providers and ongoing support for patients to achieve optimal outcomes.
Healthcare technologies such as telemedicine platforms offer strengths and weaknesses in facilitating pain management interventions for cancer patients. Telemedicine enables remote delivery of healthcare services, including pain assessment, education, and support, thereby overcoming geographical barriers and increasing access to care for underserved populations (Chen et al., 2023). Strengths of telemedicine include its potential to enhance patient-provider communication, monitor treatment progress, and deliver timely interventions in real-time, promoting continuity of care and patient engagement. However, weaknesses such as technological barriers, privacy concerns, and disparities in digital literacy limit the widespread adoption and effectiveness of telemedicine interventions for pain management (Chen et al., 2023). Additionally, challenges related to reimbursement, regulatory compliance, and integration with existing healthcare systems impact the scalability and sustainability of telemedicine initiatives in oncology care settings.
Major Components of an Intervention
One significant component is the implementation of comprehensive pain assessment protocols, supported by evidence indicating that systematic and regular pain assessment leads to improved pain management outcomes and patient satisfaction (Chapman et al., 2020). A standardized approach is made possible by the use of validated evaluation instruments, such as the Edmonton Symptom evaluation System or the Brief Pain Inventory to evaluating pain severity, location, and impact on functional status, enabling healthcare providers to tailor interventions based on individual patient needs (Zhi et al., 2021).
Another essential component of the intervention plan is the provision of multidisciplinary care, supported by evidence demonstrating the efficacy of interdisciplinary approaches in addressing the intricate requirements of chronically pained cancer patients (Connell et al., 2022). By assembling a diverse team of healthcare professionals, including oncologists, pain specialists, nurses, psychologists, and physical therapists, the intervention aims to offer comprehensive and holistic care. Collaborative care models have been shown to enhance pain management outcomes, stressing the significance of collaborative efforts between healthcare providers in order to maximize patient care (Connell et al., 2022).
Conflicting data arise from studies evaluating the efficacy of specific interventions or from differences in patient populations, healthcare settings, or methodological approaches. By critically appraising the strengths and limitations of available evidence, healthcare providers can make informed decisions about which components to prioritize, adapt, or exclude. Additionally, seeking input from multidisciplinary teams, patients, caregivers, and stakeholders can provide valuable insights and perspectives that may not be fully captured in the literature, fostering collaboration and shared decision-making.
Part 3-Impact of Stakeholder Needs, Health Care Policy, Regulations, and Governing Bodies
Stakeholders, including patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, administrators, and policymakers, have diverse and sometimes competing interests, priorities, and perspectives regarding pain management in oncology care settings. Understanding and addressing these stakeholder needs are essential for gaining buy-in, fostering collaboration, and ensuring the successful implementation and sustainability of the intervention plan (Stover et al., 2021). By analyzing existing policies, regulations, and oversight bodies, healthcare organizations can identify opportunities and constraints for implementing evidence-based pain management interventions and navigate legal and ethical considerations effectively.
Moreover, the analysis is based on the assumption that healthcare policies and regulations related to pain management in cancer care vary across different jurisdictions, healthcare systems, and practice settings. Variability in policies and regulations, such as opioid prescribing guidelines, reimbursement policies for pain management services, and accreditation standards for oncology care, impact the feasibility and scalability of the intervention plan (Paice et al., 2023). Understanding the nuances and implications of these policy differences is essential for tailoring the intervention to local contexts, advocating for necessary policy changes or waivers, and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Furthermore, it is assumed that governing bodies play a critical role in setting standards of practice, defining scope of practice, and promoting quality improvement initiatives in healthcare. Engaging with these governing bodies can provide valuable guidance, resources, and support for implementing evidence-based pain management interventions and ensuring adherence to best practices and ethical standards (Chapman et al., 2020).
Additionally, the analysis assumes that regulating organizations, laws, and policies that are pertinent to pain management in cancer treatment are dynamic and subject to change over time in response to evolving clinical evidence, public health priorities, legislative mandates, and stakeholder feedback. Anticipating and adapting to these changes require ongoing monitoring, advocacy, and strategic planning to ensure the continued effectiveness, relevance, and sustainability.
Part 4-Ethical and Legal Implications
When analyzing the moral and legal ramifications in managing chronic pain in cancer patients, several specific considerations emerge. Ethically, ensuring the provision of compassionate and patient-centered care is paramount, especially given the vulnerable nature of cancer patients experiencing chronic pain. Respecting patients’ autonomy in pain management decisions, promoting beneficence through effective pain relief measures, and upholding principles of non-maleficence by mitigating the risks of addiction or adverse effects from pain medications are essential ethical imperatives (Cherny & Ziff, 2023).
Legally, navigating the complex landscape of pain management in cancer care involves adherence to regulatory frameworks, particularly concerning the prescription and administration of opioid medications. Ensuring compliance with state and federal regulations governing controlled substances is critical to mitigating legal risks and safeguarding patient well-being (Cherny & Ziff, 2023). Additionally, addressing liability concerns associated with pain management interventions, such as adverse reactions to medications or procedural complications, requires careful consideration and proactive risk management strategies.
Identifying knowledge gaps and areas of uncertainty specific to managing chronic pain in cancer patients is vital for refining intervention plans and addressing potential ethical and legal challenges. These include uncertainties regarding the optimal balance between pain relief and the risk of opioid-related harms, gaps in understanding the cultural preferences and beliefs surrounding pain management among diverse patient populations, or unknown legal ramifications of implementing certain pain management protocols in oncology settings (Paice et al., 2023). Addressing these gaps through stakeholder engagement, legal consultation, and ongoing research can enhance the effectiveness and ethical integrity of pain management interventions in cancer care.
NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 3 Intervention Plan Design Conclusion
This intervention plan for managing chronic pain in cancer patients within oncology care settings represents a multifaceted approach intended to raise the standard of treatment and improve patient outcomes. By integrating evidence-based practices, theoretical frameworks, and considerations of stakeholder needs and healthcare policies, this plan endeavors to address the complex needs of cancer patients while navigating the challenges inherent in healthcare delivery. Moving forward, ongoing evaluation, adaptation, and collaboration will be essential to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of the intervention in meeting the evolving needs of cancer patients and promoting optimal pain management practices in oncology care.
NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 3 Intervention Plan Design References
Almasri, B. M., & McDonald, D. D. (2023). Barriers and facilitators of pain self-management among patients with cancer: An integrative review. Pain Management Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2022.12.009
Çağlayan, A. O., Redmond, S., Rai, S., Rashed, Ghose, A., Sanchez, E., Sheriff, M., & Carrim, J. (2023). The integration of palliative care with oncology: The path ahead. Annals of Palliative Medicine, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-22-1154
Chapman, E. J., Edwards, Z., Boland, J. W., Maddocks, M., Fettes, L., Malia, C., Mulvey, M. R., & Bennett, M. I. (2020). Practice review: Evidence-based and effective management of pain in patients with advanced cancer. Palliative Medicine, 34(4), 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319896955
Chen, W., Huang, J., Cui, Z., Wang, L., Dong, L., Ying, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023). The efficacy of telemedicine for pain management in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease, 14, 20406223231153097. https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223231153097
Cherny, N. I., & Ziff, B. (2023). Ethical considerations in the relief of cancer pain. Supportive Care in Cancer, 31(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07868-3
Connell, N., Prathivadi, P., Lorenz, K. A., Zupanc, S. N., Singer, S. J., Krebs, E. E., Yano, E. M., Connie, W., & Giannitrapani, K. F. (2022). Teaming in interdisciplinary chronic pain management interventions in primary care: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 37(6), 1501–1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07255-w
Coronado, V., Canet, C., Delgado, M. T., Magallón, R., Romero, M., & Gómez, J. (2020). Interventions to facilitate shared decision-making using decision aids with patients in Primary Health Care. Medicine, 99(32), e21389. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000021389
Filipponi, C., Masiero, M., Pizzoli, S. F. M., Grasso, R., Ferrucci, R., & Pravettoni, G. (2022). A comprehensive analysis of the cancer chronic pain experience: A narrative review. Cancer Management and Research, Volume 14, 2173–2184. https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s355653
Hamedi, V., Hamid, N., Beshlideh, K., Sheikh, S. E., Marashi, S. A., & Jaseb, K. (2020). Effectiveness of conventional cognitive-behavioral therapy and its computerized version on reduction in pain intensity, depression, anger, and anxiety in children with cancer: A randomized, controlled trial. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, In Press (In Press). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.83110
Hassankhani, H., Orujlu, S., Rahmani, A., Sanaat, Z., Dadashzadeh, A., & Allahbakhshian, A. (2023). Enhancing cancer pain self-management: A holistic supporting model. SAGE Open Nursing, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608231197581
Kim, H., & Jung, S. (2020). Comparative evaluations of single‐item pain‐intensity measures in cancer patients: Numeric rating scale vs. verbal rating scale. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15341
Paice, J. A., Bohlke, K., Barton, D., Craig, D. S., El-Jawahri, A., Hershman, D. L., Kong, L. R., Kurita, G. P., LeBlanc, T. W., Mercadante, S., Novick, K. L. M., Sedhom, R., Seigel, C., Stimmel, J., & Bruera, E. (2023). Use of opioids for adults with pain from cancer or cancer treatment: ASCO guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 41(4), 914–930. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.22.02198
Stover, A. M., Kurtzman, R., Walker, J., Jansen, J., Carr, P., Atkinson, T., Ellis, C. T., Freeman, A. T., Turner, K., & Basch, E. M. (2021). Stakeholder perceptions of key aspects of high-quality cancer care to assess with patient reported outcome measures: A systematic review. Cancers, 13(14), 3628. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13143628
Zhi, W. I., Gentile, D., Diller, M., Kinney, A., Bao, T., Master, V., & Wang, X. S. (2021). Patient-reported outcomes of pain and related symptoms in integrative oncology practice and clinical research: Evidence and recommendations. ONCOLOGY, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.46883/onc.2021.3501.0035
